Electric currents in unipolar active regions with different magnetic flux decay rates in sunspots
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Using the magnetographic data of the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), we calculated parameters of the magnetic field and electric currents for unipolar active regions (ARs) with low (≤ 2.1 × 1019 Mx h−1; in total, 11 ARs were analyzed) and high (≥ 7.0 × 1019 Mx h−1, 5 ARs were analyzed) magnetic flux decay rates in sunspots. We obtained the following results: 1) the stronger the local (small-scale) electric currents in the vicinity of a unipolar sunspot, the faster its decaying; 2) the distributed (global, large-scale) electric current around the rapidly decaying sunspots is practically zero. There cannot be expected a stabilizing effect on the decay of a sunspot; 3) in four cases of slowly decaying sunspots, a nonzero distributed electric current of up to 5.0 × 1012 A was detected. Perhaps such electric current can have a stabilizing effect on the decay of a sunspot.
Thus, our findings indicate that strong electric currents of small scales have a rather destructive effect on a sunspot, and the presence of large-scale currents can stabilize it. However, this mechanism seems not to be the only one and dominant in the processes of stabilization of unipolar sunspots.
Supporting Agencies
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Ed- ucation of the Russian Federation (state assignment No. 122022400224-7).
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
The metadata for this submission is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and publishing rights for texts published in Acta Astrophysica Taurica is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal.Texts are free to use with proper attribution and link to the licensing (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International).
References
Abramenko V.I., Gopasyuk S.I., 1987. Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Observ., vol. 76. pp. 147–168. (In Russ.)
Abramenko V.I., Wang T., Yurchishin V.B., 1996. Solar Phys., vol. 168, pp. 75–89.
Abramenko V.I., Zhukova A.V., Kutsenko A.S., 2018. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 58, iss. 8, pp. 1159–1169.
Cowling T.G., 1946. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 106, pp. 218–224.
Fursyak Yu.A., 2018. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1129–1135.
Fursyak Yu.A., Abramenko V.I., Kutsenko A.S., 2020. Astrophysics, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 260–273.
Fursyak Yu.A., Kutsenko A.S., Abramenko V.I., 2020. Solar Phys., vol. 295, p. 19.
Goode P.R., Denker C.J., Didkovsky L.I., Kuhn J.R., Wang H., 2003. Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society, vol. 36, S1, pp. S125–S133.
Harvey K., Harvey J., 1973. Solar Phys., vol. 28, pp. 61–71.
Hoeksema J.T., Liu Y., Hayashi K., Sun X., Schou J., et al., 2014. Solar Phys., vol. 289, pp. 3483–3530.
Ivanov S.D., Maksimov V.P., 1978. Soviet Astronomy Letters, vol. 4, pp. 127–128.
Kosugi T., Matsuzaki K., Sakao T., Shimizu T., Sone Y., et al., 2007.·Solar Phys., vol. 243, pp. 3–17.
Krivodubskii V.N., 1983. Byulletin Solnechnye Dannye Akademie Nauk USSR, no. 11, pp. 51–57.
Kubo M., Shimizu T., 2007. Astrophys. J., vol. 671, pp. 990–1004.
Kubo M., Lites B.W., Shimizu T., Ichimoto K., 2008. Astrophys. J., vol. 686, pp. 1447–1453.
Litvinenko Yu.E., Wheatland M.S., 2015. Astrophys. J., vol. 800, p. 130.
Martinez Pillet V., 2002. Astron. Nachr., vol. 323, no. 3/4, pp. 342–348.
Meyer F., Schmidt H.U., Weiss N.O., Wilson P.R., 1974. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 169, pp. 35–57.
Muller R., Mena B., 1987. Solar Phys., vol. 112. pp. 295–303.
Nye A., Bruning D., Labonte B.J., 1988. Solar Phys., vol. 115, pp. 251–268.
Pesnell W.D., Thompson B.J., Chamberlin P.C., 2012. Solar Phys., vol. 275, pp. 3–15.
Pevtsov A.A., Canfield R.C., Metcalf T.R., 1994. Astrophys. J., vol. 425, p. L117.
Plotnikov A.A., Kutsenko A.S., 2021. 16th Annual Conference on Plasma Physics in the Solar System. Collection of abstracts, p. 25. (In Russ.)